WordPress Klout Influencers

2013 Top 20 #WordPress Influencers According to #Klout

Here is the list of WordPress Influencers according to Klout.

Klout calculates and ranks influence of people and brands across social media based on the volume and types of social interactions on different networks including: Twitter, Facebook, WordPress.com, LinkedIn, Google+, Instagram, Tumblr, Foursquare, Bing Search etc.

top wordpress influencers

top WordPress influencers

Here is the list of 2013 top 20 WordPress Influencers and their Twitter Handle:

WordPress.org @WordPress, WPBeginner @wpbeginner, Matt Mullenweg @PhotoMatt, WordPress.com @wordpressdotcom

Joost De Valk @Yoast, WPMU @wpmuorg, Andrew Nacin @nacin, Lorelle VanFossen @lorelleonwp,

WP Tavern @wptavern, Brian Gardber @bgardner, Nathan Rice @nathanrice,  Justin Tadlock @justintadlock,

WordPress Freelance @wpfreelance, Ian Stewart @iandstewart, Lisa Sabin-Wilson @LisaSabinWilson, Jeff Starr @perishable,

WPCandy @wpcandy, Studio Press @StudioPress, J W @janeforshort, Brad Williams @williamsba,

All WordPress News @allWordpress, WP Engineer @wpengineer, Elegant Themes @ElegantThemes, Alex King @alexkingorg

 Note: This List is populated by Klout and does not mean anything more or less.

If you like this post; give me a +K at Klout

Klout’s new feature ruins it’s authencity & Destroies social influence of the Users

Klout’s Latest Feature Can Harm Your Influence

Klout’s new feature “What to Post” ruins it’s authenticity as a standard measuring scale and it will definitely turns the users into passive followers instead of social influencers. If being original & creative increase our influence then becoming Retweet-Bot destroies the Social Influence

“ Klout is a website and mobile app that uses social media analytics to rank its users according to online social influence via the “Klout Score”(Wikipedia)

After watching Klout for a couple of years, observing their measurement criteria and writing several blog posts about Klout, I believe “Klout Score” is one of the most reliable tools to measure and compare “social media influence” of the internet users.

Is Klout now trying to influence your influence?

Klout Social Influence Pooria

Today Klout launched a new feature; “What to Post” is the latest Klout feature that suggests content to the users in their dashboard and want the users to share the “suggested content”.

Above,You can see a preview of “What to Post” that’s a screenshot I captured from my own Klout today and you may also see the same via your own Klout dashboard.

Green Arrow shows the new feature at your networks menu.

Red Arrows show the sources of the suggested posts and you‘re encouraged by Klout to Retweet and Re-share Them!

Blue Arrow shows a field that you can publish a tweet or a “simple text” Facebook status.

I have some serious concerns to share about “What to Post”

  • First of all, how suggesting content to users helps Klout to measure their influence?
  • What’s the Klout objective “measuring influence” or shaping users taste, controlling their behavior and redefining the concept of influence?
  • Why all the sources are among most powerful media? Even though sites such as Mashable or TheNextWeb have started to publish contents, as blogs now they are too powerful and commercialized to be called blog, when it comes to social media Mashable and TheNextWeb are considered “New Mainstream Media” Yet social media is all about decentralizing information and news sources.

The pie shows a breakdown of sources for seventy five consecutive suggested posts by Klout’s “What to Post”

I assume Klout has suggested content from these particular sources based on my topics of interests and probably my social activities. So other users may receive different content from other sources that are related to their topics of interest.

My main point in this article is that Klout can’t be the judge and the advocate in the same time. By adding features such as “What to Post” Klout technically is dominating the users to follow Klout’s favorite influential sources and trends.

If Klout wants to be and remain “ The standard for Influence” it should be only measurement tool not the things such as social network, engagement platform, content promoter, feed reader, job listing, group blog etc.

There is no doubt that the publishers, which Klout is suggesting offering lots of rich, readable and share-able content, But the fact that I’ve added social media related topics to my Klout profile means I’m familiar with most recognized publishers that cover social media news and updates; Therefore I gain nothing except a feeling that if I want rise my Klout Score I must follow its suggestions, So the real benefit goes to the Klout’s suggested publishers not the users who lose their independent judgment for choosing what to read and what to share.

If I am interested in a particular topic naturally I follow the most reputable media that covers my topic of interest, For example if I follow “The Economist” on Facebook, Twitter or other social channels, I will have all the social features to interact and communicate with the page or handle that I follow, I can like, comment, reply, mention my friends, like or reply other users comments etc, But Klout “What to Post” has slaughtered all the social tools and the users are softly forced to only “Share” the suggested content and forget about any other type of social interactions.

If Klout succeeds in convincing users to use “What to Post” in long term, there won’t be a clear line between those who Retweet via “What to Post” and Retweet-Bots.

(Retweet-Bots are the Robots that Retweet any tweet automatically based on a pre-defined criteria such as a particular HashTag or Handle)

I hope Klout removes “What to Post” and any other current feature that is not truly applicable for “influence measurement”.

The dynamic and restless team at Klout is constantly developing and adding new features to keep itself on top of the influence measurement platforms.But they’ve shown a great interest to touch and get involved in other areas of Social technology.

It seems “What to Post” is not the first attempt by Klout to become something other than only a measurement platform. From very first, in addition to “social influence measurement” Klout introduced +K aiming to create and publicize a “Social Currency”. Yet in my opinion neither +K nor some other similar claims can’t be defined as social currency, world is still waiting for born and rise of full-featured & scalable social currencies. As a clue “game mechanics” and “gamifications” are among the most important missing elements that stops +K from being a social currency.

Now Klout users can use +K to exchange endorsements on their topics of interests. Therefore something that planned and claimed to be a social currency is being used for a “socializing feature” almost similar to “LinkedIn Skills”.


“Hedgehog Concept” by: Jim Collins, image credit:bit.ly/1811qvu

My humble recommendation to Klout team is to take “Hedgehog Concept” very serious through their path, Klout is a great tool for measuring social influence but this area is vast as the whole universe and Klout is not good enough, it’s still passing very early stages to meet infinite needs of its visionary goal, but Klout can be the greatest measurement tool in the world now and in the future.

Note: I’ve published this post on the Medium as well.

Is it a bug in Klout?

Klout ( The Social Media Influence Measuring Site) Seems to have a bug at users’ profile page.
I noticed Klout Auto-Plays FaceBook videos, which are listed in my “Top Moments”
I am not sure if Klout considers it a bug or a feature, but it’s weird and not so user-friendly.
Check out my Blog http://pooriast.wordpress.com for more posts about Klout click here:http://pooriast.wordpress.com/tag/klout/
Follow me on http://Twitter.com/Pooriast

ADD View Klout Score Twitter Timeline

How to add Klout Score to Twitter

By default Twitter is not providing any widget or area that users can show their Klout Score. While Klout is being popular as a standard for influence there might be many reasons for a user to find out the Klout Score of other Twitter users on the fly.

Normally when we want to see somebody’s Klout Score we have to search the name or Twitter Handle on Klout.com hand it takes lots of time.

But you can use a simple app to get the Klout Scores of the users on the fly on Twitter.

Klout Score on Twitter

Screenshot: View Klout Scores on Twitter

To see all the Klout Scores on Twitter you need to add the following extensions to your Firefox or Google Chrome Browser.

Google Chrome Extention

FireFox Extention

Bing Challenges “Google Authorship” via Klout Expert?

Klout is a tool to measure and compare the influence of people and brand across social media, By insisting on the trend of influence Klout is getting more popular day by day.

Klout is launching “Klout Expert” as its latest feature. Basically, Klout expert is a Q&A platform. Klout shows questions to the users based on their skills or “Klout Topics” and users have to answer the questions. “Klout Expert” provides users a chance to show their expertise in their favorite topics. The feature also gives Klout many benefits such as: free and fresh content, engaging more users and transforms Klout to be a professional social network.

Klout Expert Q&A

Screenshot shows a Question and answer on “Klout Expert”.

   .

It’s a while that Klout shows questions in the users dashboard and I’ve also answered some of the questions, thinking it’s just a Q&A forum kind of feature. But I’ve got so curious when I saw the screenshot that Klout published in a blog post.

Klout Blog announcement

Klout blog post says:”Starting today, an initial set of Klout Experts answers are being delivered on Bing. Influencers who take part in Klout Experts will have the opportunity to have their answers seen by millions of people using Bing search every day.”

I am certain something is going on, If Bing wants to index a webpage in a regular manner there is no need for such an announcement, The screenshot above, clearly reminds “Google Authorship” showing a thumbnail of the author is an innovation by Google. But through the same blog post, Klout add something more interesting yet mysterious:”Influence is created by the expertise we have, the way we share it and the impact it has on others. Today we are taking a big step by moving from just measuring that influence to actually helping every person maximize the impact they have on the world.”

Klout never mentions the term ” Authorship” or a synonym through the blog post. While Klout Expert is not fully launched and  most of the questions and answers on Klout Expert, yet are not indexed on Bing I did a small research and amazingly find out Bing delivers search results based on Klout Score of the authors!

Klout score ranking

This is a game changing concept, for the first time in the history of SEO instead of SEO rules and elements a search engine using “social influence” as the most decisive factor to rank the search results.

Klout-Bing-Authoship

What if using Klout score to rank the search result goes beyond the Klout Q&A?

Imagine Bing and Klout define their own peace of authorship standard, instead or in addition to  rel=”authorship” webmasters can add rel=”influence” to their webpages! If this theory is implemented the level of change and transformations is nothing but a social revolution against classic SEO. The results are unpredictable, feel free to imagine endless possibilities.

love linkedin

Your LinkedIn Skills Should Get a Major Overhaul

It’s been a while since LinkedIn has added a fresh and attractive feature to its users profile, where there is a list of “skills and expertise” of a user and other users,who are connected to him or her can endorse the user by relevant skills.  It’s a pretty engaging feature and since it has been launched most of the users have been using it extensively.

 

The list of skills and expertise endosed by connectons on LinkedIn

The list of skills and expertise endosed by connectons on LinkedIn

However LinkedIn has made this feature free and easy, and users can endorse each other with no hassle. Well this freedom of endorsement  had been criticized by some bloggers; the critics say the endorsements  haven’t been backed by any facts except the users votes. According to these social votes or endorsements Jeff Weiner ( CEO of LinkedIn) has so far received 63 endorsements for his skill and expertise over “LinkedIn” itself.

According to the criticizing point of view a guy with sense of humor but in total blindness on social networks and the related issues, might asks his connections to endorse him a hundred time for his “fake skill” on LinkedIn. Well our funny fellow shall easily be more skilled about LinkedIn  than Jeff Weiner!

Very well, the reason I am writing this post is not to discredit or criticize LinkedIn over its “skills and expertise endorsement” feature. In despite of rejecting it, I shall say I love it, it is truly social, unique, engaging, crowed generated and liberal. A great advantage of the endorsements feature is its easiness, in a blink you can endorse different people for different skills through a pre-populated endorsing widget at the top of your LinkedIn profile.

So in respond to the critics, I’ll say if someone has a great deal of business to do with LinkedIn, he certainly knows with whom he has to dance. Certainly people are smart enough not to refer to the “funny fellow” to sort out business with LinkedIn. After all, these endorsements are only one type of citation, yet there are a large number of ways to find out someone’s true skills.

The point of this article, therefore is not the way that LinkedIn collects the endorsements, but it’s to remind those skills that we ( LinkedIn users) simply ignore to add to our profiles.

Few days back I was editing my profile on LinkedIn, suddenly I found out a sad truth and as far as I did dig deeper, sadder it got. And then loads of questions blown my mind;

Why no one has listed qualities such as: friendship, integrity, honesty, dreaming, transparency, responsibility, goodwill, humor, enthusiasm,  sympathy, humanism and helpfulness along with the rest of his or her expertise and skills?

I had randomly searched profiles of my connections and their connections and the connections of my 3rd level connections, The result was “Null”. Not even one of the profiles had contained the above skills. I thought so strange, a feeling like the effect of insomnia, or a scene in ” Fight Club”, I asked myself; What’s happening to us? How on the earth it’s possible to get this epidemic amnesia?

How can you be manager without goodwill, a designer without dreaming, a leader with no sympathy, a marketer with no humor, an artist with no weirdness, an engineer with no integrity, a professional with no helpfulness or a marine biologist with no enthusiasm?

To be straight forward, I am not trying to be a preacher here. What I’m saying is strictly business. The above qualities are essential professional skills, which need to be developed and cared constantly, no matter what you do, what’s your position, your job description and experience, in the lack of the above skills you head nowhere. Whether you are a rocket scientist or a delivery boy you’ve got to have needed skills, and they include business ethics, social behavior and professional values. There are even a number of the above skills in each and every job being posted, they are just too obvious to be ignored.

I am sure people with higher expertise in behavioral science, human resource development, organizational and professional behaviour and business ethics could have endless talks and write ups on these issues, yet my job is to study and observe social media in order to find solutions, make applications and deliver marketing  campaigns, For me it was a surprise or accident to find  out what we all missed in our list of skills. I truly believe in this quote, by John Steinbeck: “It is the nature of man to rise to greatness if greatness is expected of him.”

‘ Well now lets see why almost all LinkedIn users have just missed to  add these high quality skills to their profile?’

I’ve come out with a theory that seems to justify our behavior. Perhaps I can translate this phenomenon as getting overwhelmed by the huge mass of interactions, information and technical aspects of social networks.

For the first time in the  history, We have gained the most advanced communication tools, state of the art socializing platforms, constant changes, endless technological evolutions, but we  are also people with less privacy, daily updated priorities, our social life is being scored by Klout and Analytics and without we even notice, for many of us when we buy a dress,  order food or plan a trip; the most important priority is to make sure our photos while wearing this dress or having that dish or doing another activity will get an enormous number of likes on Facebook. -Please note I am not criticizing anything here, I am just explaining the situation. – Therefore, we are very much influenced by the weaves of feedbacks we receive from social networks in a multi-direction and cross-platform atmosphere.

Many of us have experienced how this atmosphere can turn to a hurricane within few minutes, and leave us with ruined relationships, missed opportunities, embarrassments, misunderstandings and so on, these things happen so often for us, and people we know across our social networks.  Reason? it’s normal we are the first-timers, we haven’t been adopted to all these changes and their consequences.

Our parents have spent their lifetime educating us, it took them years teaching us how to behave in an appropriate manner at home or in public, but they naturally left us no clue on how to manage our social network activities, in fact many of us now trying to teach our parents how to share a link on Facebook or how to mention us in a tweet instead of calling us every other day.

Back to the point, With all these vibrations and transformations things get much more serious when it comes to LinkedIn, LinkedIn is not Facebook in despite of all the common features, because LinkedIn is the professional social network!

It means we act much more carefully on LinkedIn, we just want to be careful after all the mess we think we might have created on Facebook and Twitter, What happens on LinkedIn directly affects our job, financial issues, income and professional connections; Have you noticed the number of likes, comments and shares on LikedIn is much much less than similar interactions on Facebook? Because we usually take Facebook as the territory of our private life, a place to socialize with friends and family ( putting Facebook fan pages and groups aside), Overall we feel safer and more exposed on Facebook, But In LinkedIn we are alert.

The fear of unknown risks, rules us not to expose our inner layers, in practice many LinkedIn users try hard to expand their connections, but they just do not feel comfortable to interact with them.

As a result, when it comes to the skills, users freely go into details by adding detailed technical skills, some even include vastly common skills such as MS Word but they missed to list the fundamental skills such as: transparency, honesty and integrity, because they are feeling the fear of potential risks and prefer not to expose things, which are related to inner layers of theirselves although listing the missed skills, is necessary to reflect their professional abilities.

The above theory, more or less justifies users behaviour on LinkedIn, so we shall note LinkedIn is also accountable for creating this cold situation.

 In compare with other major social networks LinkedIn lacks the unique social networking features to fulfill  its objectives, it dose not even allow the users to upload and share the photos.Lack of photos and colors have created a rigid and cold atmosphere, when we see how Pinterest is popular among women, we surely acknowledge the warm and friendly elements that photos add to the web.

We also have to acknowledge the objectives of LinkedIn might carry some concerns to preserve the professional elements throughout the site but on the other hand LinkedIn shall put more trust on the users, lets just imagine how a humorous person acts at home or private life by being cool and entertaining and how the same person act differently at the office to satisfy and express his humor while maintaining the professional codes.

Maybe providing more icebreaking features is what led LinkedIn to develop the skills and endorsements feature, the above theory supports the endorsements as a right move by LinkedIn to make its network more social, engaging and human friendly.